ASUS AGP-V6600 SGRAM DRIVER DETAILS:
|File Size:||14.3 MB|
|Supported systems:||Windows Vista (32/64-bit), Windows XP (32/64-bit), Windows 8, Windows 10|
|Price:||Free* (*Free Registration Required)|
ASUS AGP-V6600 SGRAM DRIVER
Normally we do not care for synthetic benchmarks but this one is based on a real application that should be out in the near future. There are many tests available in 3DMark so Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM chose a few to start out with and at the resolution of x Originally I had the data for all the resolutions we normally do but it was overkill and we do not want to miss the point of the tests by flooding you with too much information.
|Benq-Siemens M75||Shop with confidence|
|Broadcom BCM-943xx Wireless Adapter||0 Comments|
|Asus CG5275||About this product|
|Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-DS2H Microsoft UAA||Shop by category|
Please note that the 3dfx VD3 would not run any of the 3DMark tests for whatever reasons. I am working to get things going for it next review. It could be drivers or it could be the benchmark for all we Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM.
The Winfast GeForce card is slightly ahead of the other two 'stock' GeForce cards but by less than a reasonable margin of error that comes into play in these tests. Benchmark Results - 3DMark - Fill-Rate single texture We hear all these theoretical numbers about fill-rate but this is what happens when we actually put cards to the real test. It Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM interesting to see that most of the cards are nearly identical in performance and I can assure you that this is the case even at Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM resolution in this test. The only thing that confuses my ideas about the benchmark having problems is the fact that the overclocked V smokes the stock V This will have to be investigated further.
ASUS V6600 Deluxe SDR GeForce
Keep in mind that this test is single-texture fill-rate. Switching our little fill-rate test to bit color returned some rather interesting results. No surprises between the GeForce cards as they all line up at about the same performance. Benchmark Results - 3DMark - Fill-Rate quad texture So we hear all about multi-texturing in this case quad or four textures per pixel from everyone but what happens when we actually use it? As you can see from the above results, the GeForce cards have no problem dealing with it while the competition chugs along. The GeForce cards are all neck and neck while the Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM V takes a reasonable lead.
As we throw in bit textures the set of GeForce cards stay together but fall much farther behind the higher clocked V and nearly letting Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM TNT2 Ultra catch them. It is a bit shocking to see the TNT2 Ultra get that close. This test has an amazingtriangles on the screen with 4 lights 1 directional and 3 point lights.
ASUS V Deluxe SDR GeForce
Every card but the TNT2 Ultra took an even performance hit from the color depth increase. Note that even the overclocked card is barely ahead. Although Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM have tapped the resolution up a bit, the story stays the same. Notice how the competitors seemed to drop greatly in performance at this Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM.
Now that the resolution has been pumped up, the cards begin to drop-off in performance. Although very slight, the V card seems to have an edge over its competition.
ASUS NVIDIA GeForce 256 (AGPV6600/PURE) 32MB SGRAM AGP 4x/8x Graphics adapter
We can also see that the overclocked board is sitting pretty at the top with its frame lead. The Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM way you will see a difference in performance between the competing GeForce cards will be if the driver revision is that different from the others which is not the case here. At the xx16 resolution, the CPU problem starts to taper off as you can see by the overclocked card pulling ahead but it does not change the fact that the GeForce cards are basically even. Benchmark Results - Descent 3 OpenGL Once again we have the low-resolution situation where most of Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM cards are in the same performance area and the GeForce boards themselves are basically all tied.
The competing boards are still very much even at this point.
Here we have a little surprise as the Leadtek board pushes slightly ahead of its competition. The overclocked Asus V charges ahead as it keeps a strong lead. Benchmark Results - Quake 3 Arena x With the release of Quake 3 Arena everyone has been anxious to see the final performance of each chipset. At the lower resolutions we will not see a big difference between the GeForce cards still but we can compare how they do against the competition. This is the case with the design of the Asus V GeForce Asus AGP-V6600 SGRAM video card. Extra effort in the design was made to allow for SGRAM.
Asus AGP-V Deluxe Review - Battle of the Titans Part 2: Who will earn Extra effort in the design was made to allow for SGRAM support.